Core Technology

Advanced nanoGUARD™

// Comparison Matrix

A comprehensive analysis of Advanced nanoGUARD performance.

RequirementsnanoGUARDFluoro-PolymersTraditionalVapor Dep.
Full Protection✓ Passes OEM req: undercoats⚠ Masking; limited undercoat❌ Not 100%; no undercoat; masking⚠ No UV dye; QC challenge
Condensation / Immersion✓ Up to IPX8✔ Comparable to actnano❌ Not 100%❌ Not 100%
Total Cost✓ Lowest overall cost❌ PCBA cleaning required; masking❌ Masking; cure and difficult to rework❌ Expensive equipment; batch; mask; can't rework
Sustainability / Human Health✓ Non-toxic; fluorine-free; no forever chemicals❌ Contains PFAS; hazardous forever chemicals❌ Toxic chemicals❌ Harsh chemicals
Operating Temp✓ -40 to 200 °C⚠ Typical max +175 °C❌ Cracking and bubbling✔ Comparable to actnano
Curing✓ No curing required✔ No curing required❌ Thermal or UV cure process⚠ No curing; Long process
Thermal Neutrality✓ Similar to non-coated✔ Comparable to actnano❌ Major heat entrapment; CTE concerns❌ Non-thermal neutral
Masking✓ None; entire board 3D coverage⚠ Limited❌ Masking required❌ Masking required
Design Constraints✓ No impact on design✔ Comparable to actnano❌ Not flexible; cracks✔ Comparable to actnano
Connect Through✓ Gel-state connect through⚠ Limited❌ Not feasible❌ Not feasible