Advanced nanoGUARD™

// Comparison Matrix

A comprehensive analysis of Advanced nanoGUARD performance.

RequirementsnanoGUARDFluoro-PolymersTraditionalVapor Dep.
Full Protection Passes OEM req: undercoats Masking; limited undercoat❌ Not 100%; no undercoat; masking No UV dye; QC challenge
Condensation / Immersion Up to IPX8 Comparable to actnano❌ Not 100%❌ Not 100%
Total Cost Lowest overall cost❌ PCBA cleaning required; masking❌ Masking; cure and difficult to rework❌ Expensive equipment; batch; mask; can't rework
Sustainability / Human Health Non-toxic; fluorine-free; no forever chemicals❌ Contains PFAS; hazardous forever chemicals❌ Toxic chemicals❌ Harsh chemicals
Operating Temp -40 to 200 °C Typical max +175 °C❌ Cracking and bubbling Comparable to actnano
Curing No curing required No curing required❌ Thermal or UV cure process No curing; Long process
Thermal Neutrality Similar to non-coated Comparable to actnano❌ Major heat entrapment; CTE concerns❌ Non-thermal neutral
Masking None; entire board 3D coverage Limited❌ Masking required❌ Masking required
Design Constraints No impact on design Comparable to actnano❌ Not flexible; cracks Comparable to actnano
Connect Through Gel-state connect through Limited❌ Not feasible❌ Not feasible